Maybe I missunderstood a few things: <quote> I think that is a dangerous way, because they want to enter in the great business and wants their software gains recognition, and they need a huge legion of developers supporting their platform and making open source flash projects. </quote>
- MM is already doing/involved in *big business*. - MM software already has great recognition. - MM already has a *huge* legion of developers. Or with 'they' were you referring to OS developers/projects? regards, Muzak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carlos Rovira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Open Source Flash Mailing List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 9:47 AM Subject: Re: [osflash] Legal Considerations That Concern Us All - Was:Re:MTASC Future Although I think that Mike has post only true asserts, and MM could have the possibility to take legal actions with some reverse enginered osflash project... I think that is a dangerous way, because they want to enter in the great business and wants their software gains recognition, and they need a huge legion of developers supporting their platform and making open source flash projects. They gain direct benefits from this relation and as Jhon Grden post, if some enterprise wants to go the flash way but they are "introducing" the technology, they could first go the os way with projects like RED5, and then go the commercial way if they want commercial support. I don't think that MM would take legal considerations with os related things (if people don't do real silly things) because they need that projects as we need it to push the platform and extend it in the coming years. _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
