hank williams wrote: > Along with your own compaints about your own sentence, I will add one more. > > It is wrong. > > The law is the law. It is written. People like myself have studied > this specific area of the law both for defensive and offensive > purposes. Hearing from MM what they intend to do is not hearing what > the legal situation is. The law is the law regardless of what MM does. > And the law and the precedent controling case law is pretty clear.
Actually, what I said wasn't wrong at all. What I said was: "apparently noone really knows currently what the legal situations are" Which was true at the time of writing. At the time nobody had stepped forward to offer any real insight into the situation. - IE P.S. You might like to spell check your emails before sending [touché] ;-) _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
