> Thank you.
> 
> Perhaps a voice different than mine will be more clear.

I don't think that what you're saying is unclear in any way at all. Quite the 
opposite, I think it's great to hear this stuff from someone with that much 
expertise and experience in this area (though I don't envy you for the 
opportunities where you had to gather it :-) )

I just wanted to give another voice to your position because I read way too 
many threads along the lines of this one where the people who actually stated 
relevant facts about the inner workings of the legal system where simply 
crushed by a large majority of people who simply assumed that if some vendor 
doesn't publish a specification to a protocol, they can pretty much forbid any 
usage of said protocol outside of their line of products by pulling some magic 
"plug".

cheers,
till

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to