Hi Ben, >1. It's busy as all hell. >2. It's illegible. Not just tough to read, but really illegible. > > You're right. Bearing in mind that it is meant to be temporary, I can't really devote too much time to it but take a look at the updated design. It should be far more legible :) http://osflash.org
>3. Does this really fit the image that Aral wants for OSFlash? If that >image includes credibility and trust (two things that are definitely on >the top of any organization's priority list), then I think it's going >to detract from that. > Credibility and trust are, of course, *very* important. But let's never forget the fun factor, lest we fool ourselves into thinking we're "grown ups" or other such mythical creatures as next we may find ourselves starting to wear ties and suits and acting in other such silly manners :) Although the wiki should be well-organized, easy to read and presented in a professional manner -- it is in essence an empty wall and you all have spray cans in your hands. It's important that the wiki is not seen as some holy scripture that cannot be altered by any but the Chosen Few. (In other words, I'd like there to be a welcome mat on the wiki for anyone with something to contribute to contribute it without feeling overwhelmed.) Your input, feedback, suggestions, etc. are invaluable and I thank you for not holding back or watering them down -- it shows that you really care and that's a wonderful thing! :) Take care, Aral _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
