Ok, I get it. So SWC is not as useful as a JAR because there is no source. Regards, Hank
On 1/17/06, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Igor V. Sadovskiy wrote: > > Because there is no well-grounded open-source tools worked with SWC (which > > creates SWC and allows to compile/link it to the target SWF). > > > > SWC contains only assembled SWF and intrinsic headers compiled into this > > SWF. And we need for Macromedia Flash Authoring Tool to create SWC. > > > > And a concept of the FAR is a little bit differed from SWC. > > > > BTW, is SWC an open format? Could some tool be implemented to generate it > > without having licence problems? > > > > Igor > > Simply rename the SWC into a ZIP and unzip it. You'll notice the > interesting equation SWC = ZIP. As you stated, the SWF does not contain > the sources but intrinsic headers and precompiled SWF code. > > Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
