I dont know anything about the internals of SWC but, if this is truly
analagous to a JAR then it is a very good idea.

Why are people talking about FAR if SWC will do the same thing?

Regards
Hank

On 1/17/06, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And on a final note (for me at least): There is something like FAR
> already - SWC. This would make much more sense to me, since it can be
> used with Flash also.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sönke Rohde wrote:
>
> > Hi Igor,
> > Why don't you compile your project with AsWing instrinsic-classes and load
> > and swf which all AsWing-Code before loading your content.swf?
> > Intrinsics compile lightspeed and this should save your 20-30secs.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sönke
> >
> >
> >>Just one more idea.
> >>
> >>I think it also will be very useful to have
> >>"-rb_include_package <package>"
> >>option in addition to "-rb_exclude_package <package>". It will be very
> >>comfortable to create DDLs.
> >>
> >>For example, I'm using AsWing in my project. Extra
> >>compilation time for
> >>compile only used AsWing classes every time takes about 20-30
> >>seconds for me
> >>(using MTASC). So I'd like to create a DLL and place all used
> >>"org.aswing.*"
> >>classes to. Later I could load this DLL in runtime or import
> >>using swfmill.
> >>
> >>But to create such DLL now I need to list all AsWing classes.
> >>I need to keep
> >>this list alive and revisit it every time I'm adding or
> >>removing some AsWing
> >>class from my sources. Also I don't want to create DLL
> >>contained all AsWing
> >>stuff to omit list revisiting (it could be too heavy).
> >>
> >>So having "-rb_include_package <package>" option I could
> >>create special ANT
> >>task and run it only if I started to use new class from
> >>AsWing framework. It
> >>will create DLL for me contained only classes used in my
> >>project. And I
> >>don't need to recompile all sources anymore after any tiny
> >>changes in my own
> >>sources.
> >>
> >>What do you think about?
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>Igor
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >>Behalf Of Simon Wacker
> >>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:20 PM
> >>To: Open Source Flash Mailing List
> >>Subject: Re: [osflash] FAR was [Hacked MTASC: ask for new feature]
> >>
> >>Hi Ralf,
> >>
> >>it is definitely possible to do this in ant, but it is much more
> >>convenient to use if you do not have to do it, but let the
> >>compiler do
> >>the job for you. ;) (and let's not forget about the
> >>programmers that do
> >>not use ant)
> >>
> >>
> >>Greetings,
> >>Simon
> >>
> >>Ralf Bokelberg wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Yes, that's what i understood also.
> >>>But i wonder, why we should do it inside MTASC, when we can
> >>
> >>do it in ant
> >>
> >>>also? Couldn't we add a dependent target, which unzips a
> >>
> >>library.zip and
> >>
> >>>adds the directory to the classpath of mtasc?
> >>>Cheers,
> >>>Ralf.
> >>>
> >>>Carlos Rovira wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Ralf,
> >>>>
> >>>>Ant would be useful to package the classes into a FAR file,
> >>
> >>but I think
> >>
> >>>>that Igor wants HAMTASC recognize that file and be able to
> >>
> >>asimilate it
> >>
> >>>>(I suppose hamtasc must unpack and process the files inside it)
> >>>>
> >>>>If not, please Igor, give your vision
> >>>>
> >>>>FAR file would be a great addition to our arsenal ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>>C.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>2006/1/17, Ralf Bokelberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> >>
> >>>>   Hi Igor,
> >>>>
> >>>>   sounds interesting.
> >>>>   If i would implement it, i would unpack the zip into a temporary
> >>>>   directory and add the name of the newly created directory to the
> >>>>   classpath. I wonder, if this can't be done more easily with Ant?
> >>>>
> >>>>   Cheers,
> >>>>   Ralf.
> >>>>
> >>>>   Igor V. Sadovskiy wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>    > Hello Ralf.
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    > I'd like to ask you about adding new feature to the
> >>
> >>MTASC. It's FAR
> >>
> >>>>    > (Flash Archive) support. FAR is just like a JAR in Java. It
> >>
> >>contains
> >>
> >>>>    > archived AS sources and could be used as element of the
> >>>>   classpath. To my
> >>>>    > mind it will be great if MTASC and most of well-known IDE
> >>>>   supports it. I
> >>>>    > could place all third-party libraries to FAR file so
> >>
> >>my project
> >>
> >>>>   becomes
> >>>>    > quite compact and portable. Libraries packed to the
> >>
> >>archive could
> >>be
> >>
> >>>>    > easy shared between projects, easy added to the CVS. Library
> >>
> >>version
> >>
> >>>>    > control will become really easier. It even will be
> >>
> >>possible to
> >>
> >>>>   use Maven
> >>>>    > with library repository to build Flash applications.
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    > I already talked with some peoples from OSFlash about (Simon
> >>
> >>Wacker,
> >>
> >>>>    > Carlos Rovira and other) and they found this idea
> >>
> >>interesting too.
> >>As
> >>
> >>>>    > soon as this feature will be implemented we could
> >>
> >>push this idea
> >>
> >>>>   to the
> >>>>    > flash community. I think all will find FAR useful.
> >>
> >>Also we will
> >>
> >>>>   ask for
> >>>>    > FAR support by the top used IDE. I think it won't be
> >>
> >>a big issue to
> >>
> >>>>    > implement this feature in some IDE.
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    > So what do you think about? Could you add FAR support to the
> >>>>   Hacked MTASC?
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    > Regards,
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    > Igor
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>    >
> >>>>
> >>>>   _______________________________________________
> >>>>   osflash mailing list
> >>>>   [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>>   http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>::| Carlos Rovira
> >>>>::| http://www.carlosrovira.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>------------
> >>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>osflash mailing list
> >>>>[email protected]
> >>>>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>osflash mailing list
> >>>[email protected]
> >>>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Simon Wacker
> >>www.simonwacker.com
> >>www.as2lib.org
> >>www.hq-heilbronn.de
> >>www.flik-flak.de
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>osflash mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>osflash mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to