Personally, I'm very impressed by the attention that Adobe is giving to this group. The fact that a Senior Vice President regularily provides helpful input to conversations on this list is a good sign that Adobe wants to do "the right thing".
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/executivebios/davidmendels.html Thanks Adobe. On 1/21/06, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, we all appreciate it for sure, if Adobe provides documentation, > open source software, breeze conferences and open source friendly eulas. > > On the other hand, i would not like to have the feeling to owe them > something. In fact, if Adobe is clever, they know, that unconditionally > supporting osflash is good for Flash and thus themself. I'm pretty > confident, that developer centric people like Mike Chambers see it in > similar ways. I'm not so sure about the marketing people, though. > > Cheers, > Ralf. > > > > > Peter Elst wrote: > > > I can definitely see your point Ralf -- its probably not a question of > > choosing one or the other, there is no reason why we couldn't be > > independent user groups and have a close affiliation with Adobe. > > > > Cheers, > > Peter > > > > > > Ralf Bokelberg wrote: > > > >>I didn't want to sound harsh, nor did i want to create a us vs. them > >>discussion. I can also see a lot of openness and support on MM's end > >>lately, but i think it's good for osflash to be as independent as > >>possible. If someone wants to join a Adobe group, i'm sure they have > >>more than enough groups to choose from. > >> > >>Cheers, > >>Ralf. > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
