>>I believe this is valid as long as the libraries are LGPL or BSD/MIT. >>And from what I've read so far MPL is also okay. GPL libraries have to >>be avoided. > > I believe with BSD and MIT you're good, but as I said, I'm unsure > about the LGPL. I'm pretty sure that if the LGPLed code is in an extra > SWF you're on the safe side. As for compiling it into the SWF ...
> "The LGPL ... Essentially, it must be possible for the software to be > linked with a newer version of the LGPL-covered program. That sounds like the key phrase. I wonder if mtasc's ability to replace a class in a swf (i.e. without needing source code for any other classes) is enough? I.e. I'm suggesting that instead of being like an EXE, a SWF is actually just a container for dynamically linked libraries, plus a main() function. Darren _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
