I think the point is that OSFlash represents many various projects whereas apache is just 1. Having a overseer to your project would not be what most managing projects on the list would want IMHO. But then again I am not one of them :)
It would be more advantageous for the individual projects to continue to manage themselves than to try to get them all to conform to the same set of values dictated by a single entity. This is just one pitfall of this type of hierarchy, unless you allow the leader of each project to sit on a OSFlash board of trustees, which seems kind of ridiculous to me. hank williams wrote: > How does apache handle this? They must have finances and they are > definitely centralized, and they have been enormously successful. > > Hank > > On 8/30/06, Aral Balkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >>> That's a gat idea but, who determine which projects get the money? >>> I mean, we knows that a IDE is necesary, but if we only have money >>> to one project, woule we spend it on ASDT? or maybe HXDT? >>> If we get some more money (to spend over various os-projects), >>> which projects get it? That could be a war... >>> >> I agree. It is much better to keep things as decentralized as >> possible. Let each project handle its own finances (if any). >> >> Aral >> >> _______________________________________________ >> osflash mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
