Heya,
Martin Heidegger wrote: > A wiki is just more than design. A lot more: People copy code from and > to it - write their homeworks or diplomas with the collected > datas. Seach fast jump to every place. Send the data from a to be. > Discuss the data. Translate it. Automatically refer to data > Align them, etc.. Of course there IS lack in some visualisation (like > autocreating a formatted book from the content) and this lack > could be filled with additionally added flash stuff but there is no > completly new wiki required - right? Everything you said, Martin, can be done in Flash. Maybe not easily at the beginning, but with effort it's achievable. So, there is only one point remaining (despite performance - not so important - and plugin adoption). Why making it on Flash, if it's doable in HTML? Well... i hate wiki sintax. I would prefer to edit my text like i do on Microsoft Word, setting bolds, italics, links, etc on real time, seeing the final result immediately. Rich text features on the fly. I would like to add images easily, drag them, resize them, crop them, etc. And like this, there are other features lacking on current available wiki systems. João Saleiro _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
