Regardless, you were only trying to help and didn't deserve the type of responses from folks around here. I personally find this list polluted with people responding in a " I'm right your wrong" fashion and find it very tiring. There are plenty of ways to explain how your opinion to others without being snobbish , standofish or downright arrogant.
I am done with reading the constant slew of negative, sefl rightous responses to folks obviously just trying to lend a hand. Kudos to you for taking time out of your day for trying to help folks Antonio. And to you arrogant people, cya *unsubscribes* Antonio De Donatis wrote: > My mistake, sorry. > > I recently changed the Outlook view related to the OSFlash mailing list to > be able to go through it faster and that made the subject almost > invisible... =) > > I wish to have been more helpful by suggesting XLEFF but it definitely has > nothing to do with XML Schema. > > -----Original Message----- > >> From: David Holroyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 23 September 2006 15:17 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [osflash] XMLSchema -> ActionScript >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 03:18:01AM +0100, Antonio De Donatis wrote: >> >>> Please note that I replied to the very first message, trying to help. >>> There was no mention of XML Schema there, although Howard >>> >> mentioned the term >> >>> "schema" (lowercase). >>> >> Sorry about the confusion, my first message should have been a bit >> clearer. >> >> Note the subject of the email though :) >> >> >> ta, >> dave >> >> -- >> http://david.holroyd.me.uk/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> osflash mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
