Hi all, coming late to the comment On 18 Oct 2006 15:10:51 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought the same thing Darron, I think it should be "cold fusion forge". > > I'm all in favor of sharing open source, but why would one put a os > flash/flex project in there rather than osflash ? >
+ > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Darron J. Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > My gut reaction after spending 5 minutes on the site: I'm not > > impressed... do we really need another site like this? not impressed either, but is it that bad ? sourceforge savannah tigris berliOS novell forge OSFlash google code hosting RIAforge etc... I think every forge has a rigth to exist :) people will go (or stay) to the forge they feel more comfortable with for ex: I don't like sourceforge, too clutered imho, but that's just me, tons of other people love sourceforge I can see people hosting some of their flash/flex project on RIAforge, I don't see the problem with that ??? before OSFlash people were hosting their flash project on other forges right ? and after OSFlash, you can still host your own project where you want right ? at worst people will be able to plan mirror of their SVN on different hosts, which can only be good imho. cheers, zwetan _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
