Someone said fuck Adobe and posted the spec on http://lkcl.net/rtmp/ Please mirror that page if you can.

Cheers,

Thijs

On 23 May 2009, at 20:38, Evert | Rooftop wrote:

I saw this too,

I don't think this has as much to do with RTMP in general, but more so the actual encryption keys. Still scary though. I suspect they are simply trying to make sure people don't rip protected RTMP streams from their paying customers.

Lets call it: Keeping the illusion up there is such as thing as non- rippable content. Once people realize if a video is displayed on a monitor, it can be recorded this would probably no longer be an issue. Reminds me of the time the HD DVD encryption key ended up on digg, which caused a bit of a revolt.

It's idiotic, because this implies a semi-random sequence of bytes can be copyrighted.

On a completely different note, I was wondering if it's legal to change my last name into:

0x47, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x75, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x20, 0x41, 0x64, 0x6f, 0x62, 0x65, 0x20, 0x46, 0x6c, 0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x20, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x64, 0x69, 0x61, 0x20, 0x53, 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
       0x20, 0x30, 0x30, 0x31,
0xf0, 0xee, 0xc2, 0x4a, 0x80, 0x68, 0xbe, 0xe8, 0x2e, 0x00, 0xd0, 0xd1, 0x02, 0x9e, 0x7e, 0x57, 0x6e, 0xec, 0x5d, 0x2d, 0x29, 0x80, 0x6f, 0xab, 0x93, 0xb8, 0xe6, 0x36,
       0xcf, 0xeb, 0x31, 0xae

I gave my cat the following name:


0x47,0x65,0x6E,0x75,0x69,0x6E,0x65,0x20,0x41,0x64,0x6F, 0x62,0x65,0x20,0x46,0x6C, 0x61,0x73,0x68,0x20,0x50,0x6C, 0x61,0x79,0x65,0x72,0x20,0x30,0x30,0x31,0xF0,0xEE, 0xC2,0x4A,0x80,0x68,0xBE,0xE8,0x2E,0x00,0xD0,0xD1,0x02,0x9E, 0x7E,0x57,0x6E,0xEC, 0x5D,0x2D,0x29,0x80,0x6F,0xAB,0x93,0xB8,0xE6,0x36,0xCF,0xEB, 0x31,0xAE

And I enjoy giving things names that are difficult to pronounce. What do you think?

Cheers,
Evert


On 22-May-09, at 6:13 PM, Thijs Triemstra | Collab wrote:

Since this is a threat to everyone here trying to advance the (open source) Flash Platform:

http://linuxcentre.net/adobe-has-issued-a-dmca-removal-request-for-rtmpdump/

Anyone from Adobe on this list that wants to respond? Because it doesn't make sense since you announced to open the RTMP spec in the first half of 2009??

Thijs
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to