That baby picture is just the cutest....

Can someone please tell me why Adobe did this? Is this to prevent
people from ripping streaming video from sites like hulu? I don't know
what rtmpdump is, what it does, or why I should care.

Thanks
Gil

On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Thijs Triemstra | Collab
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Someone said fuck Adobe and posted the spec on http://lkcl.net/rtmp/ Please
> mirror that page if you can.
> Cheers,
> Thijs
> On 23 May 2009, at 20:38, Evert | Rooftop wrote:
>
> I saw this too,
>
> I don't think this has as much to do with RTMP in general, but more so the
> actual encryption keys.
> Still scary though. I suspect they are simply trying to make sure people
> don't rip protected RTMP streams from their paying customers.
>
> Lets call it: Keeping the illusion up there is such as thing as non-rippable
> content. Once people realize if a video is displayed on a monitor, it can be
> recorded this would probably no longer be an issue.
> Reminds me of the time the HD DVD encryption key ended up on digg, which
> caused a bit of a revolt.
>
> It's idiotic, because this implies a semi-random sequence of bytes can be
> copyrighted.
>
> On a completely different note, I was wondering if it's legal to change my
> last name into:
>
>        0x47, 0x65, 0x6e, 0x75, 0x69, 0x6e, 0x65, 0x20, 0x41, 0x64, 0x6f,
> 0x62, 0x65, 0x20, 0x46, 0x6c,
>        0x61, 0x73, 0x68, 0x20, 0x4d, 0x65, 0x64, 0x69, 0x61, 0x20, 0x53,
> 0x65, 0x72, 0x76, 0x65, 0x72,
>        0x20, 0x30, 0x30, 0x31,
>        0xf0, 0xee, 0xc2, 0x4a, 0x80, 0x68, 0xbe, 0xe8, 0x2e, 0x00, 0xd0,
> 0xd1,
>        0x02, 0x9e, 0x7e, 0x57, 0x6e, 0xec, 0x5d, 0x2d, 0x29, 0x80, 0x6f,
> 0xab, 0x93, 0xb8, 0xe6, 0x36,
>        0xcf, 0xeb, 0x31, 0xae
>
> I gave my cat the following name:
>
>
>        0x47,0x65,0x6E,0x75,0x69,0x6E,0x65,0x20,0x41,0x64,0x6F,0x62,0x65,0x20,0x46,0x6C,
>        0x61,0x73,0x68,0x20,0x50,0x6C,0x61,0x79,0x65,0x72,0x20,0x30,0x30,0x31,0xF0,0xEE,
>        0xC2,0x4A,0x80,0x68,0xBE,0xE8,0x2E,0x00,0xD0,0xD1,0x02,0x9E,0x7E,0x57,0x6E,0xEC,
>        0x5D,0x2D,0x29,0x80,0x6F,0xAB,0x93,0xB8,0xE6,0x36,0xCF,0xEB,0x31,0xAE
>
> And I enjoy giving things names that are difficult to pronounce. What do you
> think?
>
> Cheers,
> Evert
>
>
> On 22-May-09, at 6:13 PM, Thijs Triemstra | Collab wrote:
>
> Since this is a threat to everyone here trying to advance the (open source)
> Flash Platform:
>
> http://linuxcentre.net/adobe-has-issued-a-dmca-removal-request-for-rtmpdump/
>
> Anyone from Adobe on this list that wants to respond? Because it doesn't
> make sense since you announced to open the RTMP spec in the first half of
> 2009??
>
> Thijs
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> osflash mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to