Hello Robert,

On 12/16/08, Robert Osfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Mattias,
>
> I've just integrated your changes but was a bit confused by the
> absence of the BUILD_DOCUMENTATION option, till I toggled on the
> advanced options in ccmake.  I don't recall the exact details, but it
> might have been this reason why the BUILD_REF_DOCS was introduced.
> Can we tell CMake to not make this an advanced option?

Ah, so thats the catch. I missed it because i have started to use
cmake-gui switched to "grouped view". I don't we can
"unmark_as_advanced". I will find a better solution or remove my
doings regarding BUILD_REF_DOCS. It seemed to be a good place to
shorten the CMakeLists.txt. "If it looks to good to be true, it
probably is"

Mattias

>
> Robert.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Mattias Helsing <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Hi Robert, all
>>
>> Added doc/Doxyfiles/openthreads.doxyfile.cmake
>> Updated all doxyfiles under doc/Doxyfiles. They are now all processed
>> by cmake but make targets are only generated for
>> OpenSceneGraphReferenceDocs and OpenThreadsReferenceDocs. The others
>> can be run with doxygen directly in <builddir>/doc.
>> Fixed a copy-paste in openthreads sproc and pthreads CMakeLists
>> Added the osg logo to the html footers
>> Added possibility to get generation of chm files.
>>
>> CMakeLists (toplevel):
>> Added install of osg and ot reference docs. This also generates
>> packaging targets of openscenegraph-doc and openthreads-doc if you
>> have packaging enabled
>> Removed the unused USING_OP_OT_TRIPLE_SET since there was no way of
>> enabling it anyway
>> Removed BUILD_REF_DOCS. IMO it was redundant - BUILD_DOCUMENTATION
>> does the same thing and we get that anyway from including
>> Documentation.cmake.
>> OsgCPack.cmake:
>> Removed generation of PACKAGE_SRC for msvc
>> Added special handling for -doc packaging targets - they don't require
>> system, architecture or compiler
>>
>> cheers
>> Mattias
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osg-submissions mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-submissions mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-submissions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to