Hi Guys, I'm inclined to just provide packaged binaries for the main targets rather than worry about all the various different options. I'd even go as far as say just providing release build packages would be fine.
The OSG itself isn't that difficult to build, and OSG users all should be capable of pulling down the sources and building their own version of the OSG. The binaries of really help out with quick evaluations of the OSG and for helping redistribution of binaries/libs with applications or as part of central repositories. For day to day development we actually want osg users to be compiling from source and testing out latest versions as this is how we get people to test and debug the OSG, which in turn is how we keep the quality of our software high - this constant testing. Over reliance on binaries during the development cycle will lead to less of the community testing the source build and runtime, which is not something we really want to encourage. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
