Hi Paul, On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Paul Martz <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. The example should probably display an error and exit if it > can't find the file. After I update and get your merge, I'll make this > change. Anyhow, glad it runs for you.
On merging your changes and do testing I've also reflected on the implementation, and feel that integrating num instances support directly into the base PrimitiveSet base class and adding support for draw instanced GL into the DrawArrays*, DrawElements* class would be the neatest approach. I've gone ahead an implemented this, as well as support for the NumInstances member variable into the .osg and .ive formats that is backwards compatible. With my changes I've also moved the extension set and calling into osg::State, this means the extensions are set up per graphics context rather than per object as in your implementation, something that should avoid issues with using multiple graphics contexts under Windows as the function pointers can be different per context. I've changed your example to work with the the original class names - its just a straight renamed from DrawArrayInstanced to DrawArrays in one line in your code. I also added a writeNodeFile to test out the writing & reading of .osg and .ive files, this is commented out right now as it's there only to test. It's a really nice little example BTW, especially cool that it serialises in and out so easily so you can run the demo in a standard OSG app like osgviewer. All these changes are now checked into SVN. Could you test them out? One thing I haven't implemented is high level reporting of lack of support for this extension - all I've done is implement a fallback to glDrawArrays etc without error reporting. Given this is a fine grained operation it's not ideal to go adding lots of reporting code in their. Ideally we'd have a formal high level mechansim for reporting on the required extensions for a specific scene graph vs what is supported by the various graphics contexts. This is something for a osg-users discussion for future rev's of the OSG. Many thanks for the effort on this extension, I had assumed that support would be more awkward than you've shown it to be. Knowledge is King! Sharing Knowledge is a great Virtue! ;-) Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
