Hi Alberto, I'm just doing a review of your new .pc files. Splitting the files is appropriate, but I wonder if the naming should map directly to the library names, so rather than openscenegraph.particle.pc, it should openscenegraph.osgParticle.pc.
I also wonder if we should keep the old unified openscenegraph.pc file which is the same catch all as before, and then add an openscenegraph.osg.pc for just the core osg library. This way users who've previously relied upon the catch all nature of the original openscenegraph.pc will still be able to use it as before. Then new users who want to select specifc components can do so using the new files. Thoughts? Robert. On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Alberto Luaces <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have finally splitted the openscenegraph.pc file into several ones, one for > every library of the OSG. Every of those files has inside its dependencies > from the other OSG libraries. > > It should be beneficial for people linking their programs to OSG with the > pkg-config system, in order to not to have to link to all OSG libraries if > they are not using all of them. > > I have made the patch against the latest 2.8.0 rc 3 version, but it should > work seamlessly against the 2.9 version as well. Just tell me if it doesn't. > > Regards, > > Alberto > > _______________________________________________ > osg-submissions mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org > > _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
