Hi Robert, El Martes 19 Mayo 2009ES 17:06:28 Robert Osfield escribió: > Hi Alberto, > > I'm just doing a review of your new .pc files. Splitting the files is > appropriate, but I wonder if the naming should map directly to the > library names, so rather than openscenegraph.particle.pc, it should > openscenegraph.osgParticle.pc. > > I also wonder if we should keep the old unified openscenegraph.pc file > which is the same catch all as before, and then add an > openscenegraph.osg.pc for just the core osg library. This way users > who've previously relied upon the catch all nature of the original > openscenegraph.pc will still be able to use it as before. Then new > users who want to select specifc components can do so using the new > files. > > Thoughts?
Ok, fine by me. I'm then renaming all the files to something like openscenegraph-osgSomething.pc and return back the old openscenegraph.pc file. Regards, Alberto > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Alberto Luaces <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have finally splitted the openscenegraph.pc file into several ones, one > > for every library of the OSG. Every of those files has inside its > > dependencies from the other OSG libraries. > > > > It should be beneficial for people linking their programs to OSG with the > > pkg-config system, in order to not to have to link to all OSG libraries > > if they are not using all of them. > > > > I have made the patch against the latest 2.8.0 rc 3 version, but it > > should work seamlessly against the 2.9 version as well. Just tell me if > > it doesn't. > > > > Regards, > > > > Alberto _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
