Jolley, Thomas P wrote:
I think back to writing assembly code and reading the status register of a device where it was easy to test if something had changed by checking if the register was negative. There were other bits in the register so it was useful to think of it as signed in that first test in order to use fewer instructions. Perhaps not in osg but there can be reasons to think of a bitmask as signed.
It'd be neat if this discussion were about how OSG handles FBOs instead of the coding style we use for bitmasks. I'm moving this discussion to osg-users with a different subject line so that it will hopefully catch Robert's attention. A quick ruling by him would put an end to this discussion.
-Paul _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
