Hi Windows dev's, Could we have some feedback on my suggestion for simply using the default std::pair<> constructor?
Robert. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Robert Osfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I've just reviewed both of your proposed fixes and both seem rather > long winded. I'd be inclined towards Mark's solution as it doesn't > rely on any optional compile paths. I do wonder if one might just be > able to use a default constructed CapEntry as it's just typedef > std::pair<..> and would std::pair's default constructor not just > initialize to 0 for us? > > Robert. > _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
