So get me that GLExtensions change. :) Oh, and I didn't mean we'd prefer to test 2., but that we'd prefer 2.2 to be well tested, and can help do that with a developer release. The infrastructure guys need to put CMake into the system, and I'm ready to go.
andy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Osfield Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:20 PM To: osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Subject: Re: [osg-users] OpenSceneGraph-2.2 most sensibly kept tillafterSiggraph? Hi Andy, On 8/1/07, Andy Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, we'll test a lot more as soon as we get finished incorporating > latest OSG into our build environment. I'd like another developer > release with the GLExtensions change made, but at the moment I'm using > 2.1.3 and making that change myself. I think we'll need at least a couple more dev releases before 2.2. I'll make another one this week once the viewer changes I'm making look solid. > We definitely would prefer 2.2 to have a good round of testing. If don't test thoroughly it well it's likely we'll just end up making another release shortly after... it is a bit of catch 22 though - many users these days way for the stable releases before testing it out, which doesn't actually help with making sure those stable releases are as stable as they could be. Users that pitch in and test the SVN and dev versions are worth there weight in gold :-) Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.or g _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
