On 10/4/07, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Robert Osfield -- Thursday 04 October 2007: > > The non commercial clause is there due to some of the files, most will > > actually be OK to copy and use of commercial use but to be rather safe > > than sorry the README is conservative. > > "Actually OK" isn't really enough, when the license literally > forbids it. So, David can't take a camera config file, adjust > it to his needs and distribute it with a GPL project. This would > be derived work.
Its fine to take the config files, you just need to ask me for permission. > > How I'd very much support the community rally around and creating a > > new data repository with everything under a much more permissive > > license. I'm not a modeler or content creator though. > > FlightGear's repository is full of free models, which you could take > under the GPL. But it's no source for OSG specific stuff. And without > free demos available it's unlikely that it ever becomes one. Perhaps this is something the community. > Anyway, could you at least fix the embarrassing spelling of > "commercial" in the OpenSceneGraph-Data/README? ;-) What to you might seem as a incompetence is actual a disability. If you see a mistake fix it and send me the file. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
