-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christophe Medard wrote: > Sorry for the mailer redisposing of things. > Here are the examples I wanted to submit : > > > | > -------------------------------- > | | > osg::Group "A" osg::Group "B" > [binNumber = 8] dft, so binNumber = 0 > | > --------------------------------------------- > | | | > osg::Geode "C" osg::Geode "D" osg::Geode "E" > [binNumber = 5] [binNumber = 1] | > | > ---------------- > > | | > osg::Drawable E0 osg::Drawable E1 > dft, so binNumber = 0 [binNumber=6] > > Is it B/E0 - D - C - A - E1 ? No. Assuming that E is a child of A, and by the rendering order of a group you mean other drawables that are under that group, the order is B-A-E0-D-C-E1. If E is not a child of A -- I can't tell from the diagram -- then the order is B/E0-E1-A-D-C.
It turns out (I didn't know this) that the sign of a render bin number is significant; negative child bins are drawn before a bin's render leaves, postive bins are drawn after. > > > Another example, closer to my current purpose test, practical to make multi > pass drawings : > > | > osg::Group > | > ------------------------------------- > | | | > | | | > | osg::Group "B" osg::Group "C" > | [binNumber = 20] [binNumber = 30] > | > osg::Geode "A" > [binNumber = 15] > > > Is it A - B - C ? Yes. Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHBPP4eDhWHdXrDRURArhVAJoC5ENolBRvuwevA4O6oBtSrRWZFACgpl/1 9K7HUvn2NWv1ahs1NlEhXpc= =nulc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
