Hi,
I was hoping someone might be willing to explain to me the difference in
const-semantics between ref_ptr and observer_ptr, i.e. why is it that I
can get a non-const pointer from get() on a const ref_ptr, but not from
an observer_ptr? Is this by design?
osg/ref_ptr
T* get() const { ... }
osg/observer_ptr
T* get() { ... };
const T* get() const { ... }
I only ask because it caused me some confusion the other day when
converting some ref_ptrs to observer_ptrs and vice versa.
Thanks,
Craig
This e-mail and any attachments are provided through AEgis
Technologies' e-mail services and may contain company sensitive and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
illegal.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
