Hi Robert,
>> In other words, for 2 side-by-side screens, it will return
>>
>> screen 1 = 0, 0, 1280, 1024
>> screen 2 = 1280, 0, 1280, 1024
>>
>> and for 2 screens one above the other, it will return
>>
>> screen 1 = 0, 0, 1280, 1024
>> screen 2 = 0, 1024, 1280, 1024
>
> Have you tested and confirmed that this is the case? i.e. is it
> something we can rely upon? If so then it would be very useful.
Yes, I tested it and works (as long as it is set that way in the driver
- i.e. just placing your monitors one above the other won't change
anything if you don't change their arrangement in the driver :-) ).
> Adding a virtual getScreenPosition to the WindowSystemInterface base
> class would be straight forward. I don't know yet how one would
> implement it under X11, but it should be possible.
OK, I'll submit something soon. Note that it will only have a concrete
implementation for Win32 in the beginning...
> Given the above then the next tweak of
> View::setUpViewAcrossAllScreens() could then take this info, but...
> only if its actually implemented so we'd need a fallback.
The fallback would probably be that screen n's x position would be the
sum of all the previous screens' widths, which would give a linear setup
(so no change compared to current behaviour).
J-S
--
______________________________________________________
Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cm-labs.com/
http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
