Hi Paul,

I must admit not having given the FAQ much attention in the last year.
 It would be good to start updating it/reorganising it.   I'm fully
open to suggestions on how to improve it and assistance with improving
it.  I'd suggest kicking out a separate thread for this.

Robert.

>  It seems that a percentage of the posts on the lists can be considered
> straight items from the FAQ on the website. I recently did a bit of editing
> on the FAQ as it isn't really the most readable piece on the site.
> Particularly, I updated some stuff that seemed to reference OSG versions
> when Producer was still used, deleted/replaced broken URLs and fixed some
> wording and spelling. However, I stil think it can be improved and hopefully
> make more people consult it before posting to the list. Things I had in
> mind:
>  - Structure the items in a few sections (e.g. Introduction/Overview,
> Building/Installation, File formats, General development, Linux-specific,
> Windows-specific, etc)
>  - Update the list of file formats to include information on read/write
> support of all plugins
>  - osgViewer seems to be responsible for a fair amount of posts, perhaps it
> deserves its own section in the FAQ?
>
>  Now, I don't have enough knowledge of every piece of OSG to edit all the
> entries, but I'd be happy to continue improving the FAQ. I didn't see an
> easy way for structuring, as currently an automatically generated overview
> of the questions is used. Any tips there?
>
>  Paul
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  osg-users mailing list
>  osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
>  http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to