Mike Weiblen wrote:
Haven't had a chance to review, but Thank You Very Much for moving this forward!
-- mew
Thanks :)
I made some more changes, mostly edits and moving things around. I
noticed the really nice page containing the file format overview! It's
linked from the FAQ now.
Here and there I added lines marked with "XXX" to indicate some stuff
that needs to be expanded/clearified/etc. For some topics I feel I'm not
the one with all the details.
BTW, there's some different usage of OSG, OpenSceneGraph, the
OpenSceneGraph, etc. Perhaps we should get these consistent. Would
referring to "The OpenSceneGraph" be the best variant?
Paul
PS Updated FAQ is still in the sandbox for now
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Paul Melis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did an initial restructuring in the wiki Sandbox. See
http://www.openscenegraph.org/projects/osg/wiki/SandBox/FAQ
Let me know what you think.
Paul
Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Paul,
I must admit not having given the FAQ much attention in the last year.
It would be good to start updating it/reorganising it. I'm fully
open to suggestions on how to improve it and assistance with improving
it. I'd suggest kicking out a separate thread for this.
Robert.
It seems that a percentage of the posts on the lists can be considered
straight items from the FAQ on the website. I recently did a bit of
editing
on the FAQ as it isn't really the most readable piece on the site.
Particularly, I updated some stuff that seemed to reference OSG versions
when Producer was still used, deleted/replaced broken URLs and fixed
some
wording and spelling. However, I stil think it can be improved and
hopefully
make more people consult it before posting to the list. Things I had in
mind:
- Structure the items in a few sections (e.g. Introduction/Overview,
Building/Installation, File formats, General development,
Linux-specific,
Windows-specific, etc)
- Update the list of file formats to include information on read/write
support of all plugins
- osgViewer seems to be responsible for a fair amount of posts, perhaps
it
deserves its own section in the FAQ?
Now, I don't have enough knowledge of every piece of OSG to edit all the
entries, but I'd be happy to continue improving the FAQ. I didn't see an
easy way for structuring, as currently an automatically generated
overview
of the questions is used. Any tips there?
Paul
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
