On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paul, > > > I'm submitting this as a new application (rather than example) and > calling > > it "osgio". > > Thanks for this useful little utilitity. > > I do wonder if we could gather various functions together into a > single application, something like osginfo, or osgconfig. For > instance gdal has gldal-config: > > > gdal-config > Usage: gdal-config [OPTIONS] > Options: > [--prefix[=DIR]] > [--libs] > [--dep-libs] > [--cflags] > [--version] > [--ogr-enabled] > [--formats] > > Perhaps we could go the same route, and have CMake provide config > details for it. This isn't a bad idea. It would certainly be useful for Linux users who would rather use automake or old-fashioned make itself to build osg binaries. What would "--libs" contain though? You could certainly make it contain all nodekits being built as part of the OSG as declared in CMake if that's what you're getting at (so you wouldn't have to update the list manually)? As for osgio, it might not be a bad idea to have it's functionality placed in an "osg-config" or "osginfo" type binary. Placing this kind of stuff in osgversion is probably a bad idea. -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
