On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Luigi Calori <l.cal...@cineca.it> wrote:
> Philip Lowman ha scritto: > >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Luigi Calori <l.cal...@cineca.it<mailto: >> l.cal...@cineca.it>> wrote: >> > Findosg just finds "libosg.so" and "osg.lib". Similarly FindosgDB just >> finds "libosgDB.so" and "osgDB.lib". FindOpenSceneGraph orchestrates >> calling all of these small find modules. And yes, I've put a warning note >> in Findosg.cmake to steer the new user to FindOpenSceneGraph.cmake. We >> can't dramatically change the behavior of Findosg.cmake, again, for >> backwards compatibility reasons. CMake aspires towards 0 user build >> regressions on version upgrades both in Source/ and in Modules/ >> > I do not know how much are the single Findosg<component> used compared to > FindOpenSceneGraph, if there are many, than compatibility issues are > important, otherwise probably not.. It's impossible to tell. I know of at least three projects that use them. If you'd like to make FindOpenSceneGraph work so that it only needs to depend on Findosg_functions.cmake I would be fine with that provided that if it encounters a node-kit it doesn't know about that it falls back on calling find_package(Findosg<Kit>.cmake). This might be a happier solution for everyone. -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
