Thank you all, I'll try the new code from osg-submissions. Kind regards. Alessandro
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Michael Platings <[email protected]>wrote: > I had a quick look at your submission, it looks like you have had a good > go at fixing the (my :-) ) transparency mess! So I won't submit any fixes. > Any chance you can give me a heads up on your thinking behind > "getTransparencyCounts", I am puzzled by it! > > Certainly - some files use a transparency value of 1 to mean completely > opaque (the spec says this is correct) while other files use a transparency > value of 1 to mean completely transparent. It's hard to be completely > certain of which meaning is used, so instead I added a heuristic to make a > best guess: If there are more transparency values of 0 than 1 then 0 is > interpreted to mean opaque, otherwise 1 is interpreted to mean opaque. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > >
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
