Hi René,
Maybe the DOM 2.2 binaries could go into the 3rdparty folder or repository?
that way the plugin becomes 'out of the box' like png and freetype
or do we want a limited set of 3rdparty binaries?
I think we'd have to survey to see how many people use it, because it's
a pretty big dependency (over 12MB for the dynamic version, and over
70MB for the static version! and that's just for VC9sp1). If only a
small portion of users use it... The png and freetype libs are pretty
much required to do anything useful with OSG...
About the 2.8.3 release:
I recently updated sources to use the new manipulators in 2.9.7 .
Is there a stable release to be expected that include these (nice!)
improvements?
I wouldn't mind these changes in 2.8.3 but other users of the old
manipulator code will have to change some code.
It's pretty easy to add #if OSG_VERSION_GREATER_THAN in your code so
that it works for both versions of OSG. That's what I did when I tested
if our framework worked with OSG 2.9.7 (in particular for the changes in
osgManipulator).
At some point Paul will have to draw a line, or else why not merge all
the changes and make 2.8.3 equal to the trunk? Anyways, there should be
a 2.10 release eventually, right? :-)
J-S
--
______________________________________________________
Jean-Sebastien Guay jean-sebastien.g...@cm-labs.com
http://www.cm-labs.com/
http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
