Yes, you're right. A good OSG coding habit is to just always assign to osg::ref_ptr.
>Is it true that if I declare a pointer as follows: > >osg::Group* test = new osg::Group; > >I would have a memory leak since I can not call a delete on "test" >object pointer? > >So, this is the reason why I should use a ref_ptr instead as follows? > >osg::ref_ptr<osg::Group> test = new osg::Group; > >In this case the smart pointer will take care of the object deletion as >soon as the test variable goes out of scope. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
