Hi Robert,
Not a problem at all, happy to help. Thankyou for making such a great
library available.
Incidentally, can I suggest a minor change in the new FAQ entry?
Presently it is:
"The extensible of the new formats enables end user application ..."
How about, instead, one of:
"The extensible nature of the new formats enables end user applications
...";
"The extensibility of the new formats enables end user applications ..."; or
"The new formats enable end user applications ..."
?
Garth
On 06/01/12 20:27, Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Garth,
Thanks for the notification. I have amended this FAQ entry to mention
the new .osgt, osgx and .osgb formats and how .osg and .ive related to
older versions of the OSG.
Robert.
On 6 January 2012 05:37, Garth D<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
The OSG FAQ here:
http://www.openscenegraph.org/projects/osg/wiki/Support/FAQ#DoestheOpenSceneGraphhaveanativefileformat
lists "osg" and "ive" as the native OSG formats.
Is this still accurate? Should this be listed as "osgb" for the binary
format, and "osgt" for the text format? Or have I got this backward? Or is
it a bit more complicated than that?
If the FAQ is incorrect, is there somebody I should let know?
Cheers. :)
Garth
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
