Hi All,
Github is an excellent solution for both code and some
documentation, but can the wiki be edited by any user? the wiki must
be accesible with some privileges to any user that wants to
contribute.
If robert is Ok, with git, and the control of the repository on
github can be transferred, the first thing to do is stop making
changes on the subversion. Then we will address how to migrate the
current wiki to github, or hosted on dreamhost.
Cheers,
JL
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Mathieu MARACHE <[email protected]> wrote:
> Following up to myself :-)
>
> So for the record, here is a sample of the wiki that I made just to
> experiment :
> http://openscenegraph.github.com/
>
> two repositories are in sync with the svn repos :
> - https://github.com/openscenegraph/osg for osg source code
> - https://github.com/openscenegraph/osg-data for the data
>
> HTH
> --
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> On 9 January 2012 08:56, Mathieu MARACHE <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sorry for the late answer, I created and maintained the github
>> openscenegraph mirror account since Mar 01, 2010.
>>
>> At the time I even created a page to explain howto get the code via
>> git on the main osg site (like the svn page)... We should be able to
>> dig it from osg website archive in case...
>>
>> I'm ok to pass the ownership of this account to Robert if needed. I
>> currently have a cronjob that tracks the svn source repository and
>> commits back to the github mirror. I tracked trunk, 2.8 and 3.0
>> branches specifically.
>>
>> Since this is a mirror I wouldn't commit to it in parallel of the
>> subversion repository. This should only be considered as a read-only
>> mirror or a full replacement of the subversion repo...
>>
>> I've been using github (like many many users) for a long time and
>> found it to be reliable and git is more than a successful successor to
>> svn. (IMHO :) ). It has also the possibility to host wikis and the
>> "pull request" feature is quite a nice way top integrate external
>> submissions (although much different than Roberts actual process).
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 January 2012 10:42, Stephan Huber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Am 05.01.12 17:42, schrieb Robert Osfield:
>>>> A question to yourself and everyone else - what wiki's would be best?
>>>> Mediawiki?
>>>>
>>>> I don't have much experience with wiki's outside the OSG's website
>>>> onces so would very much welcome feedback from others that have
>>>> maintained and contributed to other wiki's.
>>>
>>> I used DokuWiki[1] in the past, and it works as advertised. It's
>>> file-based, easy to set up and stable in usage.
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://dokuwiki.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> osg-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
--
Jose L. Hidalgo Valiño (PpluX)
---- http://www.pplux.com ----
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
