Hi Sergey,
On 26/04/12 23:39 , Sergey Polischuk wrote:
> Replying to myself :)
>
> Problem is: declaration of set(...) methods in derived Matrix*Template
> classes hides base class MatrixTemplate::set(...) pack of methods
> This can be solved by adding line:
> using MatrixTemplate<[template params]>::set;
>
> in each derived class declaration.
>
> May be someone have better solution?
There recently was a similar case with the Vector* implementations that could
be solved by
using the 'base_class' typedef in each class.
So rather than:
Matrix2Template( const Matrix2Template& mat ) { set(mat.ptr()); }
it would be:
Matrix2Template( const Matrix2Template& mat ) { base_class::set(mat.ptr()); }
Could you try that and submit a patch if it works?
On a related note, it feels weird to have all this Matrix/Vector related stuff
in the
'Uniform' header file, as it can create much confusion with what's already in
the 'Matrix'
and 'Vector' header files.
If this is truly Uniform only would it make sense to scope it to 'osg::Uniform'
or put it
into separate header files like 'UniformMatrix' and 'UniformVector'?
Thoughts?
Cheers,
/ulrich
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
