On 7/25/06, Daniel Larimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Qt uses pthreads on OS X / Linux and probably something native for windows.
Isn't that what OpenThreads already does? So rather than have OpenThreads over the top of pthread or win32, you have OpenThreads over the top of Qt which is over the top of pthread or win32. Reading the Qt page the main benefit would be extra machine code atomic increment/decrement. It would interested profiling things to see. Perhaps the Qt style changes could be applied to OpenThreads to the general benefit. Not to say a QThreads implementation of OpenThreads wouldn't still be useful, OpenThreads is so tiny it would be easy to support another path. What is the licensing implications? Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
