Hi Roland, On 8/10/06, Smeenk, R.J.M. (Roland) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps the "correct" behaviour should depend on the way the flight specification describes comments. If multiple comments per node are allowed I think the new loader is the logical choice otherwise the old loader seems better to me.
The osg::Node does support multiple description strings.
If the choice is made to leave things this way, at least this difference should be added to the porting notes. With the new loader people will have to split up the description into separate lines themselves when parsing for instance for "@dis" (WRM entry) at the beginning of each line.
I'm in two minds. It would be nice to minimize porting woes, and for such as small detail it might be worth just sticking with original approach. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
