> There is some VC++ magic that goes on behind the scenes. > If a project claims another project as a dependency (for tax > purposes, maybe ;), and that other project generates a > library, VC++ seems to implicitly link against that library > without it being listed in the linker inputs.
Understood. The OSG examples, then, will be implicitly linking against the (non-static) DLL export .lib files. PLUS, they will also be linking against the *_s.lib static libraries. This explains why the examples fail to link with multiply defined symbols when both static and dynamic libs are built. So, my real question is, isn't this a problem? Or should we simply build just the static OR the dynamic libs, and ignore this issue? -Paul _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
