I use CMake on OS X independent of Xcode. It just uses "make" instead which seems to work fine.
When the KDE team started moving to CMake, the folks at Kitware got real involved in helping them move to CMake. I am guessing if someone approached them stating that OSG would like to move to CMake I am thinking they might help us out. Just a guess. Mike On 8/17/06, Daniel Larimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try this link out for size. http://qtnode.net/wiki/Qt4_with_Xcode http://scottcollins.net/blog/2005/07/two-days-of-programming-qt-and- xcode.html I don't want to get involved with the build process decisions. As a Mac OS X user I have seen my share of unfriendly build systems. I hope that CMake will allow me to build from the command line using gnu make on OS X. Xcode should not be required. Dan On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:20 PM, E. Wing wrote: > I didn't know qmake could generate Xcode projects too. I've been > googling for information about this, but I haven't found much. The > first hit is a cryptic thread about the Xcode generator being removed > from the open source version which is worrisome to me. > > If you can find me a good documentation about what the extent of qmake > support for OS X-isms are and what the Xcode generator can and cannot > do, I would be interested in reading it. > > Having said that, CMake is the devil we know. Within the CMake/OS X > community, we've been pounding the drum for both OS X native features > and Xcode support for about 2 years now and the CMake authors have > been reasonably responsive. A lot of this has been play for awhile > now. The OSG/CMake Wiki page lists the remaining OS X shortcomings > when I wrote it. Before that, they had already done a bunch of stuff > for OS X. Currently the framework building is the only thing still > missing. > > I have also been using CMake on Windows (Visual Studio, Msys), Linux, > and FreeBSD and have had few complaints so I'm comfortable with their > cross platform support. > > I also know that the CMake authors (and userbase to some extent) are > interested in getting high profile projects to switch. The KDE > adoption of CMake was a big thing for them. I know they are interested > in seeing OSG switch too and they seem willing to help those projects > where they can. > > -Eric > > > On 8/17/06, Daniel Larimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All, >> I have also looked at various cross-platform solutions and must say >> that I have yet to find anything that works better than qmake. >> qmake is open source, GPL, and is included on most Linux distros by >> default. There are binary installers for OS X and Windows. It >> supports both MS VC and Xcode. >> >> When used properly it uses some very clean project files and >> properly handles creating .app bundles on Mac OS X. >> >> Many people don't realize that it will work well on projects that >> don't even use Qt. >> >> I worked on a project with over 100K lines of code spread across 50+ >> directories entirely powered by qmake. >> >> Dan >> >> _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
-- Mike Jackson imikejackson _at_ gee-mail dot com _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
