How do users feel about the current form
of OSG? Would there be interest in an OpenGL ES-based OSG, call it OSG ES? This
would be a dramatic departure from the current architecture, but a smaller OSG
started from a new slate, compatible with both OpenGL and OpenGL ES, might be a
good starting point for "OSG 2.0".
Assuming everything is open for discussion in
this thread... What about changes to OSG's governance? I think what Robert and
Don have done is an excellent story about a successful open source project. That
being said, is it time for OSG to move to a more formal governing body?
Something along the lines of the (defunct) OpenGL ARB? Companies with a vested
interest in OSG would gather to develop and decide on new functionality?
Membership fees would pay for new development?
I'm not necessarily promoting any of this, but
I did want to see how others felt.
Paul Martz
Skew Matrix Software
LLC
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Martz;Paul;E. FN:Paul E. Martz ORG:Skew Matrix Software LLC TITLE:President TEL;WORK;VOICE:(303) 859-9466 TEL;WORK;FAX:(303) 443-3327 ADR;WORK:;;284 W. Elm St;Louisville;CO;80027;United States of America LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:284 W. Elm St=0D=0ALouisville, CO 80027=0D=0AUnited States of America URL;WORK:http://www.skew-matrix.com EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20060918T003327Z END:VCARD
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
