QUick apology. I got slammed with the D.C. training and just didn't get to this. Glad to see it is being resolved.
-don
On 10/31/06, Eric Sokolowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Robert Osfield wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> On 10/31/06, Eric Sokolowsky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > A while back I uploaded some OSG 1.2 packages for Fedora Core 4. Did
>> these
>> > ever make it to the download page?
>>
>> I'm afraid not, thanks for the reminder though, I'll need to update them.
>
> I'm just looking at the .rpm's on the ftp upload directory:
>
> OpenSceneGraph-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> OpenSceneGraph-debuginfo-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> OpenSceneGraph-devel-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> OpenSceneGraph-examples-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> OpenThreads-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> OpenThreads-devel-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> Producer-1.2-2.i386.rpm
> Producer-devel-1.2-2.i386.rpm
>
> I was a bit suprised to see the OpenThreads and Producer versions
> tagged with the OSG release number rather than their own release
> numbers.
This is the sort of feedback that I wanted to have. I can tag Producer
and OpenThreads with their own version numbers. What should they be?
> Would renaming them be sufficient? Would they still work?
Simply renaming them would not work because OpenSceneGraph depends on
specific version numbers.
--
____ __ Eric Sokolowsky (GST) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
/ __/__/_/__ Visualization Programmer Scientific Visualization Studio
/ __/ _/ / _/ 301.286.3751 Mailstop 610.3 Bldg 28 Rm E102
/___/_//_/__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greenbelt, MD 20771
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
