On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Robert Osfield wrote:
On 10/31/06, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Don,
On 10/31/06, Eric Sokolowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A while back I uploaded some OSG 1.2 packages for Fedora Core 4. Did
these
> ever make it to the download page?
I'm afraid not, thanks for the reminder though, I'll need to update them.
I'm just looking at the .rpm's on the ftp upload directory:
OpenSceneGraph-1.2-2.i386.rpm
OpenSceneGraph-debuginfo-1.2-2.i386.rpm
OpenSceneGraph-devel-1.2-2.i386.rpm
OpenSceneGraph-examples-1.2-2.i386.rpm
OpenThreads-1.2-2.i386.rpm
OpenThreads-devel-1.2-2.i386.rpm
Producer-1.2-2.i386.rpm
Producer-devel-1.2-2.i386.rpm
I was a bit suprised to see the OpenThreads and Producer versions
tagged with the OSG release number rather than their own release
numbers.
This is the sort of feedback that I wanted to have. I can tag Producer
and OpenThreads with their own version numbers. What should they be?
Would renaming them be sufficient? Would they still work?
Simply renaming them would not work because OpenSceneGraph depends on
specific version numbers.
--
____ __ Eric Sokolowsky (GST) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
/ __/__/_/__ Visualization Programmer Scientific Visualization Studio
/ __/ _/ / _/ 301.286.3751 Mailstop 610.3 Bldg 28 Rm E102
/___/_//_/__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greenbelt, MD 20771
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
