You're right that it does make the link time longer and is not the optimal situation, but I don't/didn't always have control (source code) of the libraries I'm linking. I don't do this anymore since I mostly create/use only dynamic libraries now. But this technique isn't totally useless since it does free you from having to determine dependencies...
On 11/9/06, Jan Ciger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 c sklu wrote: > To prevent this situation, I usually double-link, that is put the list > of libraries twice: > > i.e. -lliba -llibb -lliba -llibb > This is useless and only makes the linking time longer because the linker has to parse twice as many libraries. A better solution is to make sure that: a) Modules of your program are cleanly designed (i.e. no situation that A needs B and B needs A) b) You order the libraries in the link step in the order of dependency. Regards, Jan - -- Jan Ciger GPG public key: http://www.keyserver.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFUzfzn11XseNj94gRAibkAJ9i8QbeyZ7S7N+/7t9HDOPQ2Bn3mACfVb9Q 6TLMX1ATvKST1QB0t/XewkA= =xwRZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
