Umm, no, it doesn't matter how many libs you have, you would do something like:
LIBS = -lliba -llibb -llibc -llibd -llibe ..... then in your link line, just use $(LIBS) $(LIBS) So then if libb needs something from liba, the first time around it will be missed, but it will be resolved the second time liba is mentioned. This is a pretty old technique from before the time shared libs were commonly available. On 11/9/06, Jan Ciger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 c sklu wrote: > You're right that it does make the link time longer and is not the > optimal situation, but I don't/didn't always have control (source > code) of the libraries I'm linking. I don't do this anymore since I > mostly create/use only dynamic libraries now. But this technique isn't > totally useless since it does free you from having to determine > dependencies... Well, not really - what if you have more than two libs? E.g. three or four? Are you going to list all possible permutations? That would be quite a mess :( Jan - -- Jan Ciger GPG public key: http://www.keyserver.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFU0uzn11XseNj94gRAvJCAKDBBClEnCWfasz69yQy1Ju0VfsxWgCdEtlx gJPR94ta5+b1JHPXY28UhIQ= =x0NO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
