Hi Don,
"Don Burns" wrote:
> The current build is fine. Producer users are building and working with it
> with no problems being reported. We are actively discussing improved build
> systems on Producer-users (which has been in place since December of 2004
> and exists for discussing issues directly related to Producer). The move to
> DWMake was simply a cleaner way to do the current build, but it probably
> won't be the final solution.
That's exactly the point. Why should people take the current state of
Producer for a try as long as you require an external dependency just
for the build of a single piece of software ? This move is completely
superfluous - and I definitely call this state as an "issue" with
Producer that I have the impression you didn't realize.
If you really want to do some exercise for your own pleasure, then why
don't you save the users from the trouble you currently pose on them
and simply merge this "DWMake" stuff into Producer in a way, that users
can get back to building Producer by typing 'make' ?
> SO, please, feel free to do cvs updates, and build as you normally have.
As I already reported, this simply does not work with the current build
system in Producer:
sirius: 22:42:40 /usr/local/src/Producer> make
Make/local_makedefs:3: DWMake/makedefs: No such file or directory
GNUmakefile:6: DWMake/makedirrules: No such file or directory
People on this list have reported this issue several times now,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
