I don't understand. If you're going to keep the Producer features and file
format then why not just keep Producer as well?
Or, What the problem with Producer?
J.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Osfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "osg users" <osg-users@openscenegraph.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [osg-users] What do you want for the osgviewer example
Hi Serge,
On 1/11/07, Serge Lages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the configuration files, do you plan to use another syntax than
Producer, like Xml files ? Because I thing that it would be great to have
it
in Xml with definitions files (.xsd) to easily create and edit them.
I will probably stick with the same style of syntax as .osg files and
use the same parsers.
The .osg if more human readable than .xml, and doesn't require
external libraries to read and write it. I'm most probably just have
a osgViewer plugin. I am contemplating allowing scene graph elements
to be saved along with the viewer configuration file, the use of this
is to allow us to experiment with distortion correction using standard
osg::StateSet & osg::Geometry. I
This doesn't preclude others implementing their own XML formats for
serializing the scene graph or viewer configurations.
Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@openscenegraph.net
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@openscenegraph.net
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/
