On 6/5/07, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If they can't be fixed in time for 2.0 then really shouldn't be in
there.   A CMake Makefile based build that actually works, albeot with
not all features that all OSX users might desire is infinitely better
than a XCode project that doesn't work at all.

Just a little progress report.  Martin has spent much of today
download XCode 2.4, and getting to grips with it and the OSG's old
style XCode build. The XCode projects just needed a few additions to
get the core libraries and apps working, these fixes have now been
checked in.

I believe there a few problems left to resolve, but for the most part
it looks like the XCode projects should be stable in time for 2.0, so
Frameworks are still possible, albeit not using CMake.  I'm pretty
happy with the Makefile build using CMake under OSX so to me it looks
like we are pretty reasonable shape w.r.t OSX build.

On the runtime side like Stephan we've come across crash on exit from
a small number of the OSG examples, discussion about these belongs in
a separate thread, and will require a bit more investigation at our
end too so this is something for tomorrow.

Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@openscenegraph.net
http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users
http://www.openscenegraph.org/

Reply via email to