Il 05/02/2014 10:39, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto: > Having a build server would be a plus and help with more up-to-date packages, > but it also means a lot of initial work. It's optional, but still requires > to redo stuff that's already there. But if I had a machine and the time I > would probably jump on it. ;)
Can't we use our new, powerful QGIS server @Hetzner for this? > Mostly the mapserver part - I'd vote for removing all of that - and have one > stable mapserver package (set) and if necessary a nightly build of trunk - > just > like qgis and qgis-dev. big +1 for me what prevents us (Tamas) from just go ahead? All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ osgeo4w-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev
