Is that a preference to have one directory for each project? (I'm not sure about whether such conveniences exist) Regarding to qgis we seem to have:
qgis/qgis - release qgis/qgis-dev - development (daily) Do anyone object to remove/regenerate all the mapserver related stuff for x86? Or alternatively we can start with x64 first (where no mapserver exists) and then migrate the layout to x86 if everything is ok? Best regards, Tamas 2014-02-05 Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]>: > Il 05/02/2014 10:39, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto: > > > Having a build server would be a plus and help with more up-to-date > packages, > > but it also means a lot of initial work. It's optional, but still > requires > > to redo stuff that's already there. But if I had a machine and the time > I > > would probably jump on it. ;) > > Can't we use our new, powerful QGIS server @Hetzner for this? > > > Mostly the mapserver part - I'd vote for removing all of that - and have > one > > stable mapserver package (set) and if necessary a nightly build of trunk > - just > > like qgis and qgis-dev. > > big +1 for me > > what prevents us (Tamas) from just go ahead? > All the best. > > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > osgeo4w-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev >
_______________________________________________ osgeo4w-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev
